The concepts of a "new physics," which require an
intellectual Paradigm
Shift !,
must contain intuitive truths that will remove doubt concerning
Infinity and our relativistic, cyclical, evolutionary environment . . .
this environment is the world in which we live; referred to as . . .
Reality.
Infinity, beyond the limits of the macro and micro
environment, can be described as that which is not Reality.
This is a more limited and discriminating definition of Infinity
than that which is provided by mathematicians and philosophers.
There is only one Infinity; and, it is not a function of
distance or size; Infinity is a function of speed. Infinity
is found at . . . both . . .
of speed's limits.
The
concepts of this "new physics" must be capable of being
understood by young school children; and, these new concepts must
embrace the freedom of Intelligent Inquiry; and, most importantly, they
must not require an abundance of unquestioning faith.
Such is Conceptualism.
Currently, It can easily be reasoned that: Fundamental physics
theory is based entirely upon metaphysics.
That is: Physics, as currently understood by its
practitioners, is little different than any major religion in that its
fundamental principles depend, entirely, upon varied mythology and
conjecture; all of which requires said abundance of faith.
Almost all world-class physicists understand why all of their
most fundamental concepts and paradigms have been labeled as no more
than theory; and, they understand the implication thereof; which is,
that an excessive amount of faith is required for a belief in that which
cannot be proven.
However, almost all other persons are impressed otherwise . . .
the general belief is that science, and more particularly physics, is
fundamentally based upon fact.
It is not!
And, further, it is most important that the transcendental aspect
of current science is acknowledged and well understood by not only
theoretical physicists but by all persons.
It is not!
The lack of a general understanding that the
fundamental principals of physics are entirely dependent upon a
metaphysical faith is largely because: The certainty of applied
scientific method, concerning said fundamental principles, is strongly
implied by academia . . . rather than academia clearly stating that: The
fundamental principles of physics actually, entirely, embrace
metaphysics.
Generally,
these fundamental principles usually involve space and time, and four or
five forces, sometimes fewer, sometimes more, depending upon which
authority is being consulted. Usually
the considered forces are: Gravity, Light, the strong and weak atomic
forces, and occasionally, inertia or the cosmological constant.
The cosmological constant is often considered a force because of
its inertia-like opposition to Gravity.
Because of recent observations of galactic recession and other
cosmic motions, the cosmological constant has been resurrected from a
long discarded invention of Einstein's.
All these concepts of space, time, and forces are little
understood . . . if at all.
The
fundamental concepts of physics have been invented to explain observed,
natural happenings but are not at all provable or, basically,
understood.
They are a form of symbolism that is useful for representing
inexplicable, natural phenomena; and are thus, similar to the gods which
were prehistorically invented to explain the sun, thunder, lightning,
and so on.
Quite likely, the ancients had a better understanding of god than
the designing, anthropomorphic representations that modern religions now
provide.
Space and time have been linked by Einstein's space-time.
Though there is much justification for such a linkage, it is
still similar to linking the words "light-gravity" and their
enigmatic connotations. The
linkage of space and time, each a poorly understood concept, in itself,
only creates confusion. Particularly,
when space is no more than a relative illusion of our senses.
Space,
more appropriately time, is not only a function of speed, but it does
not actually exist as usually envisaged . . . it is relative,
an illusion.
There is no "space" where "something" such as
Light waves can not be found.
In fact, all matter, no matter how dense, is composed entirely of
wave phenomena.
It is our senses that are not sensitive enough to perceive
certain "matter" and waves, which completely fill all
"space." Our
senses, thus, create the illusion of matter and, subsequently, the
illusion of voids between various wave phenomena.
Dyosphere, an acronym from from the words
"dynamic"
and "oscillation," is a label for
"space," which refers to both "macro-space" such as
the Cosmos and "micro-space" such as that which is between
subatomic particles and smaller phenomena. The term dyosphere is
preferred to the term "space" because it more accurately
connotes the nature of the phenomenon.
Reality is without voids. Reality
is causal and local; everything is in resonant contact with something . . .
and everything . . . at some relative speed.
The apparitions of Reality's non-local, or non-linear, phenomena; such as
tunnelling, quantum teleportation, photon entanglement, solitons, universal,
gravitational and inertial, action-at-a-distance, et cetera; are
associated with speeds beyond that of Light.
Time,
fundamentally, is a mystery to physicists.
The label "time" refers to several phenomena which are usually,
deceptively commingled.
There is cyclical time, linear time, electromagnetic time, et
cetera; as well as, directional and reversible time that must be
considered.
No one has been able to clearly define whether, or not, time is directional;
nor, differentiate, clearly, the differing concepts of time; nor,
explain the generative origins of these "times."
Time as a function of, or a form of, speed is the most
fundamental, and thus mysterious, of concepts which underlie Reality.
No one can explain the "why" of Gravity; only the "how" is explainable.
No one knows the speed of Gravity, which is near infinite.
However, infinite speed is not allowed by most interpretations of
the Theory of Special Relativity.
But, then, if Gravity's speed were as allowed by the usual
interpretation of the Theory of Special Relativity, Gravity
"waves" should have been found by now.
They have not been found; nor, has any other physical
manifestation of the cause of Gravity's action been found. Gravity
waves are "beyond the pale" of understanding until the
etiology and internal structure of Pulsoids,
as heuristically defined herein, is accepted.
Gravity's
attraction, or "action-at-a-distance," is an inexplicable
mystery that has defied any interpretation.
Einstein considered action-at-a-distance as . . .
"spooky."
Gravity,
as currently understood, can easily be said to belong to the realm of
metaphysics.
Actually, it will be found that gravitational
"attraction" is a combination of three phenomena: relative,
hierarchic compression; critical coalescence; and confluent
congruence.
Relative, hierarchic compression is the occurrence of Pulsoidal
compression as new Pulsoids are created at the point of critical
coalescence. Confluent congruence is a universal phenomenon that effects all
events and occurs near Infinity well beyond the speed of Light.
Light
is understood even less than Gravity, if that is possible.
Sometimes, the phenomenon of Light is explained as acting like a
wave; and, at other times, Light appears to act as a particle.
The concepts of particle and wave are two concepts that cannot be
more physically, or diametrically, opposed to one another; nor, when
combined, as with the theory of light, more inexplicable without
resorting to metaphysics.
Also, of metaphysical interest, concerning Light, is the current
explanation of the speed of light as being relatively constant.
This constant is unlike anything else known and defies all known
logic . . .
Again, a strong metaphysical faith is required for understanding
the speed of light as a constant.
The
atomic strong and weak forces have been fabricated, admittedly, by
physicists to explain observed subatomic phenomena.
No one has ever been able to explain
"why" they "work."
Or, for that matter, there are no answers to the related
questions of:
How did such a tremendous amount of energy, as is observed within
an atom, get
into that atom?; and, What is holding this energy within the atom?
And
then, concerning inertia: there are very few physicists that will even
acknowledge that there is an inertial force . . . despite many
recent cosmic observations to the contrary.
Inertia's close relative, the cosmological constant, can hardly
qualify as a force until it is acknowledged that it is not a constant.
By definition, a mechanical force cannot be constant; it must
entail acceleration.
Einstein resorted to the cosmological constant because of
structural necessity; but, he soon realized it as a mistake; as he had
interpreted it.
Though, Einstein can hardly be faulted; as an understanding of
the source and etiology of both Gravity and inertia is still quite
erroneous . . . if interpreted at all.
A form of a cosmological force that opposes Gravity, and is, thus,
structurally necessary, must be explainable if our environment is to be
understood . . . and, most importantly, an inertial force, can
replace the considered necessity of the misleading Big Bang theory and
all of its absurdities.
Such an inertial force is referred to as Cosmic Inertia, which
together with Gravity, its alter ego, is referred to as Infinite
Dynamics.
Gravity, inertia, and the atomic forces are all very closely related to
the enigmatic and ubiquitous phenomenon which has been described as
"exotic" dark-matter.
It is this unknown, and unfound, dark matter that is generally
considered to constitute almost
all of the mass of the Universe.
The etiology of "exotic" dark-matter is at the crux of
explaining the long-sought relationship between Gravity and Light.
Said etiology answers simple, basic questions such as: How does Light become mass?; and: How are atoms formed?
The etiology of "exotic" dark-matter is a salient
phenomenon that is a pillar of the Equilibrium Theory of Reality
with its ever repeating, infinite, congeneric realms of coalescence,
compression, and dissipation.
The term "exotic
dark-matter
structures" more
descriptively defines the phenomenon of the "missing" matter,
which is referred to, more simply, by the acronym "edams."
edams
are Pulsoids or Ultrons, which are composed of hylotrons, which consist of four phorbs.
Phorbs are somewhat analogous to quarks and are linked orbits of
critically coalesced Light
waves, referred to as
"coalescents," which exhibit the first evolutionary properties
of mass.
Hylotrons are analogous to gigantic, double proto-neutrons, which
condense to atoms; thus, forming quasars and gamma ray bursts.
It is edams
that can be considered as the Rosetta Stone to an understanding of
Reality.
edams,
Pulsoids, and Ultrons are labels for the same phenomenon. When
used, these terms differ only in emphasis and connotations: edams
emphasize the manifestation and qualities that arise from
speculation concerning the "missing" Universal matter; Pulsoids emphasize
the dynamic, internal geometry and complex oscillations and seminal
etiology of the "missing" matter phenomenon; and, Ultrons connote the subatomic particle
aspects of said phenomenon.
Physicists are amiss in standing mute with their myriad physical
theories, none of which much concern the origin, constitution, and
destination of life.
Life is as much a physical phenomenon as any other matter that is
addressed by the theories of academic physics.
Without addressing the physics of life . . . and consciousness
. . . the theories of physics are incomprehensive,
irreconcilable, sterile, and rife for
the worldwide proliferation of theological and philosophical mythology.
Life and consciousness are manifestations of a phenomenon known
as:
casa.
casa
is an acronym for complex,
analog
self-adjustment,
which describes the causal, and related, creation of all life.
Without a clear understanding that life and consciousness are
subject to the same rules as Gravity and Light, a person is subject to
as much mythology and superstition as is any devout acolyte.
A strong statement by the scientific community that the fundamental
paradigms of physics are theory and incomprehensive is not enough; the
term "theory" when so applied has evolved, in the public's
mind, to connote almost an accepted certainty.
The fact that the currently accepted foundation of academic
physics is based upon metaphysics, and that it scrupulously avoids the
issues of life and consciousness, is seldom, even privately,
acknowledged, or so considered, by physicists; who, for the most part,
otherwise, abhor that which can not be proven.
Physicists do adequately address the
"how" of Nature; but, they fall far short concerning
an understanding of the "why's" of Nature.
It is because of the misunderstanding of the "why's"
of Nature and the physicists' silence concerning life and
consciousness that accounts for much of the self-imposed suffering of
the human race.
Physicists tend to present their theories (the Atomic theory,
Special and General Relativity theories, Quantum theory, the
Big Bang theory, Black Hole theory, Inflation theory, Quantum
Chromodynamics theory, et cetera) as fact.
Or, possibly, even more recklessly, most scientists stand aside
without argument and allow others in the general media to present the
fundamental and ancillary theories of physics as fact; often, without
any known mention that they are only unproven theories that are
internally inconsistent and fraught with irreconcilable difficulties and
omissions.
Currently, no two fundamental theories of physics are completely
reconcilable with one another.
As with religions that, impossibly, claim that each is
infallible, most likely . . . none are correct.
The obfuscation of the
"why's" of Reality's perceptions by physicists has
encouraged, for all persons, including physicists themselves, much
misunderstanding and subsequent, direct and consequential, suffering.
Myth and superstition, to any degree, are deleterious.
The
inability of most elite physicists to communicate fundamental theory
beyond their mathematically-oriented, arcane discipline, as reflected by
their current paradigms, as anything other than an impression of their
certainty concerning their general understanding of Reality
is egregious and arrogant.
And, also, this lack of critical communication is quite,
directly, responsible for much of said human suffering . . . pain, both
mental and physical.
False
prophets, that underlie most that is evil, proliferate when aggressive
exposure of myth and superstition is silent.
There must be an emphasis upon removing all excessive metaphysics from
the paradigms of physics; a strong beginning would be to clearly
establish that which is currently metaphysical and illusionary: such as,
the currently accepted concepts concerning linear space-time and the
fundamental forces.
This would create an environment more conducive to alternative
reasoning; and, it would assist with the acceptance of life and
consciousness theories into the collegial domain of academic physics.
Proselytizing
for their narrow, transcendental cause is more deceptive as practiced by
physicists than is even that of the theologians and philosophers.
Theologians, as represented by the practicing clergy, may be more
actively involved and disingenuous; but, others are able to judge more
easily their deception than that of the theoretical physicists.
Recently,
philosophers have had little influence upon the thoughts and behavior of
the general public because they cannot even agree among themselves as to
the meanings and interrelationships of their many contentious
disciplines; and, also, for the most part, philosophers have recently
abdicated the study of physical
Reality to the scientists, and metaphysics to the theologians;
consequently, there is very little of substance that remains for the
discipline of philosophy.
Science, theology, and philosophy are diverging, increasingly,
from their early historical unity.
Theologians
are generally quite honest concerning their lack of "scientific
proof"; and, they are quite up front about their religious
arguments requiring both: a large amount of faith; and, an acceptance
that religious proofs cannot be directly known.
Almost the exact
opposite of the theologians' stance are the arguments
of physicists and, to a lesser extent, the arguments of philosophers;
yet, the analogy, that fundamental physics' practitioners and their
paradigms are analogous to that of religions' high priests and Scripture
. . . is quite apt; because both are near the apex of elitism; and, neither have any rigorous
proofs as to their most fundamental concepts and beliefs.
There
is absolutely no agreement between world-class physicists as to the
nature of any fundamental truth that underlies any of their primary
concepts of space, time, and force; concepts that are, for the most
part, only illusions predicated upon the human condition.
In fact, there is little speculation, at all, among world-class
physicists concerning the
natural origins of said fundamental concepts.
Not
only are all the current, fundamental paradigms of physics quite in
error; but, also, in error is the uniform system of numbers which
underlies most of the mathematics upon which the foundation and proofs
of physics are established.
The Hindu-Arabic numbering system is both uniform and linear; the
only other such concept in nature that is uniform and linear is Newton's
description of inertia . . . both are without proof . . . both are
seriously flawed.
In
Nature, there are no perfectly straight lines; nor, perfectly circular circles.
Such straight lines and circles are only generated at the
limits of the distance between an ellipse's foci; and precise limits are
only at Infinity, which is beyond Reality.
Nature's fundamental
curves are sinusoidal ellipses, which generate prime numbers and helical
ellipses.
Prime numbers are Nature's numbering units, which together
with "Fibonacci" sequencing accounts
for Nature's exponential-like powers of scale from the subatomic to the
cosmic.
Sinusoidal and elliptical curves are, respectively, the geometric
curves of
Light and Gravity; thus, prime numbers unite the formulas of Light and
Gravity . . . the quest of Einstein.
Nature's numbering system is based upon four classes of prime
numbers; rather than, equal units of odd and even integers.
Nature's numbering system is referred to as Conceptual
Arithmetic, which is a subset of Unimetry.
All
the current, fundamental paradigms of physics contain internal
inconsistencies; and, none are reconcilable with one another.
To reconcile and remove the inconsistencies of current, fundamental
theory, and to address the issues of speed and time related to Infinity, as well
as, life and consciousness, an entirely new perception of
Reality is required; this new perception, or "new physics,"
is best illustrated by Conceptual Relativity, which is considered
a Paradigm
Shift !
And,
this Paradigm
Shift !
is applied to more than scientific theory; and, as thus, it is
referred to as:
Conceptualism . . . an all encompassing
philosophy concerning an understanding of Reality . . .
and Infinity.
Conceptualism is a discipline that emphasizes scientific method,
enlightenment, and Intelligent Inquiry; and, more specifically,
it concerns Oneness and the Unified Concept; its
purpose is to liberate the impressed minds of persons exposed to myth
and superstition in the sciences; and, thereby, establish an Intelligent
Inquiry which will be conducive to minimizing an over reliance upon
blind faith; and, thereby, not only unify the fundamental theories of
physics; but, also, unify the disciplines of Science, Theology, and
Philosophy.
|