a short essay concerning . . .
Understanding Reality

which concerns fundamental concepts of

physics theory

which is a requirement for

promoting the well-being of all persons.



The theory of gravitation...(is) not understandable from the laws of motion...it stands isolated from...other theories.  Gravitation is...not understandable in terms of other phenomena.
 

.                -Richard P. Feynman [1918-1988]        
QED, 1985        


The concepts of a "new physics," which require an intellectual
Paradigm Shift !, must contain intuitive truths that will remove doubt concerning Infinity and our relativistic, cyclical, evolutionary environment . . . this environment is the world in which we live; referred to as . . . Reality.  Infinity, beyond the limits of the macro and micro environment, can be described as that which is not Reality.  This is a more limited and discriminating definition of Infinity than that which is provided by mathematicians and philosophers.  There is only one Infinity; and, it is not a function of distance or size; Infinity is a function of speed.  Infinity is found at . . . both . . . of speed's limits.

The concepts of this "new physics" must be capable of being understood by young school children; and, these new concepts must embrace the freedom of Intelligent Inquiry; and, most importantly, they must not require an abundance of unquestioning faith.  Such is Conceptualism.

         Currently, It can easily be reasoned that: Fundamental physics theory is based entirely upon metaphysics.

That is: Physics, as currently understood by its practitioners, is little different than any major religion in that its fundamental principles depend, entirely, upon varied mythology and conjecture; all of which requires said abundance of faith.
 

Almost all world-class physicists understand why all of their most fundamental concepts and paradigms have been labeled as no more than theory; and, they understand the implication thereof; which is, that an excessive amount of faith is required for a belief in that which cannot be proven.  However, almost all other persons are impressed otherwise . . . the general belief is that science, and more particularly physics, is fundamentally based upon fact.  It is not!  And, further, it is most important that the transcendental aspect of current science is acknowledged and well understood by not only theoretical physicists but by all persons.  It is not!

The lack of a general understanding that the fundamental principals of physics are entirely dependent upon a metaphysical faith is largely because: The certainty of applied scientific method, concerning said fundamental principles, is strongly implied by academia . . . rather than academia clearly stating that: The fundamental principles of physics actually, entirely, embrace metaphysics.


Generally, these fundamental principles usually involve space and time, and four or five forces, sometimes fewer, sometimes more, depending upon which authority is being consulted.  Usually the considered forces are: Gravity,
Light, the strong and weak atomic forces, and occasionally, inertia or the cosmological constant.  The cosmological constant is often considered a force because of its inertia-like opposition to Gravity.  Because of recent observations of galactic recession and other cosmic motions, the cosmological constant has been resurrected from a long discarded invention of Einstein's.  All these concepts of space, time, and forces are little understood . . . if at all.

The fundamental concepts of physics have been invented to explain observed, natural happenings but are not at all provable or, basically, understood.  They are a form of symbolism that is useful for representing inexplicable, natural phenomena; and are thus, similar to the gods which were prehistorically invented to explain the sun, thunder, lightning, and so on.  Quite likely, the ancients had a better understanding of god than the designing, anthropomorphic representations that modern religions now provide.

Space and time have been linked by Einstein's space-time.  Though there is much justification for such a linkage, it is still similar to linking the words "light-gravity" and their enigmatic connotations.  The linkage of space and time, each a poorly understood concept, in itself, only creates confusion.  Particularly, when space is no more than a relative illusion of our senses.


Space, more appropriately time, is not only a function of speed, but it does not actually exist as usually envisaged . . . it is relative, an illusion.  There is no "space" where "something" such as Light waves can not be found.  In fact, all matter, no matter how dense, is composed entirely of wave phenomena.  It is our senses that are not sensitive enough to perceive certain "matter" and waves, which completely fill all "space."  Our senses, thus, create the illusion of matter and, subsequently, the illusion of voids between various wave phenomena.

Dyosphere, an acronym from from the words "
dynamic" and  "oscillation,"  is a label for "space," which refers to both "macro-space" such as the Cosmos and "micro-space" such as that which is between subatomic particles and smaller phenomena.  The term dyosphere is preferred to the term "space" because it more accurately connotes the nature of the phenomenon.

Reality is without voids.  Reality is causal and local; everything is in resonant contact with something . . . and everything . . . at some relative speed.  The apparitions of Reality's non-local, or non-linear, phenomena; such as tunnelling, quantum teleportation, photon entanglement, solitons, universal, gravitational and inertial, action-at-a-distance, et cetera; are associated with speeds beyond that of Light.

Time, fundamentally, is a mystery to physicists.  The label "time" refers to several phenomena which are usually, deceptively commingled.  There is cyclical time, linear time, electromagnetic time, et cetera; as well as, directional and reversible time that must be considered.  No one has been able to clearly define whether, or not, time is directional; nor, differentiate, clearly, the differing concepts of time; nor, explain the generative origins of these "times."  Time as a function of, or a form of, speed is the most fundamental, and thus mysterious, of concepts which underlie Reality.

No one can explain the "why" of Gravity; only the "how" is explainable.  No one knows the speed of Gravity, which is near infinite.  However, infinite speed is not allowed by most interpretations of the Theory of Special Relativity.  But, then, if Gravity's speed were as allowed by the usual interpretation of the Theory of Special Relativity, Gravity "waves" should have been found by now.  They have not been found; nor, has any other physical manifestation of the cause of Gravity's action been found.  Gravity waves are "beyond the pale" of understanding until the etiology and internal structure of Pulsoids, as heuristically defined herein, is accepted
.

Gravity's attraction, or "action-at-a-distance," is an inexplicable mystery that has defied any interpretation.  Einstein considered action-at-a-distance as . . . "spooky."

Gravity, as currently understood, can easily be said to belong to the realm of metaphysics.  Actually, it will be found that gravitational "attraction" is a combination of three phenomena: relative, hierarchic compression; critical coalescence; and confluent congruence.

Relative, hierarchic compression is the occurrence of Pulsoidal compression as new Pulsoids are created at the point of critical coalescence.  Confluent congruence is a universal phenomenon that effects all events and occurs near Infinity well beyond the speed of Light.


Light is understood even less than Gravity, if that is possible.  Sometimes, the phenomenon of  Light is explained as acting like a wave; and, at other times, Light appears to act as a particle.  The concepts of particle and wave are two concepts that cannot be more physically, or diametrically, opposed to one another; nor, when combined, as with the theory of light, more inexplicable without resorting to metaphysics.  Also, of metaphysical interest, concerning Light, is the current explanation of the speed of light as being relatively constant.  This constant is unlike anything else known and defies all known logic . . .  Again, a strong metaphysical faith is required for understanding the speed of light as a constant.

The atomic strong and weak forces have been fabricated, admittedly, by physicists to explain observed subatomic phenomena.  No one has ever been able to explain "why" they "work."  Or, for that matter, there are no answers to the related questions of:  How did such a tremendous amount of energy, as is observed within an atom, get into that atom?; and, What is holding this energy within the atom?

And then, concerning inertia: there are very few physicists that will even acknowledge that there is an inertial force . . . despite many recent cosmic observations to the contrary.  Inertia's close relative, the cosmological constant, can hardly qualify as a force until it is acknowledged that it is not a constant.  By definition, a mechanical force cannot be constant; it must entail acceleration.  Einstein resorted to the cosmological constant because of structural necessity; but, he soon realized it as a mistake; as he had interpreted it.  Though, Einstein can hardly be faulted; as an understanding of the source and etiology of both Gravity and inertia is still quite erroneous . . . if interpreted at all.

A form of a cosmological force that opposes Gravity, and is, thus, structurally necessary, must be explainable if our environment is to be understood . . . and, most importantly, an inertial force, can replace the considered necessity of the misleading Big Bang theory and all of its absurdities.  Such an inertial force is referred to as Cosmic Inertia, which together with Gravity, its alter ego, is referred to as Infinite Dynamics.

Gravity, inertia, and the atomic forces are all very closely related to the enigmatic and ubiquitous phenomenon which has been described as "exotic" dark-matter.  It is this unknown, and unfound, dark matter that is generally considered to constitute almost
all of the mass of the Universe.

The etiology of "exotic" dark-matter is at the crux of explaining the long-sought relationship between Gravity and
Light.  Said etiology answers simple, basic questions such as: How does Light become mass?; and: How are atoms formed?  The etiology of "exotic" dark-matter is a salient phenomenon that is a pillar of the Equilibrium Theory of
Reality with its ever repeating, infinite, congeneric realms of coalescence, compression, and dissipation.  The term "exotic dark-matter structures" more descriptively defines the phenomenon of the "missing" matter, which is referred to, more simply, by the acronym "edams."  edams are Pulsoids or Ultrons, which are composed of hylotrons, which consist of four phorbs.  Phorbs are somewhat analogous to quarks and are linked orbits of critically coalesced Light waves, referred to as "coalescents," which exhibit the first evolutionary properties of mass.  Hylotrons are analogous to gigantic, double proto-neutrons, which condense to atoms; thus, forming quasars and gamma ray bursts.  It is edams that can be considered as the Rosetta Stone to an understanding of Reality.

edams, Pulsoids, and Ultrons are labels for the same phenomenon.  When used, these terms differ only in emphasis and connotations: edams emphasize the manifestation and qualities that arise from speculation concerning the "missing" Universal matter; Pulsoids emphasize the dynamic, internal geometry and complex oscillations and seminal etiology of the "missing" matter phenomenon; and, Ultrons connote the subatomic particle aspects of said phenomenon.


Physicists are amiss in standing mute with their myriad physical theories, none of which much concern the origin, constitution, and destination of life.  Life is as much a physical phenomenon as any other matter that is addressed by the theories of academic physics.

Without addressing the physics of life . . . and consciousness . . . the theories of physics are incomprehensive, irreconcilable, sterile, and rife for the worldwide proliferation of theological and philosophical mythology.  Life and consciousness are manifestations of a phenomenon known as:
casa.  casa is an acronym for complex, analog self-adjustment, which describes the causal, and related, creation of all life.  Without a clear understanding that life and consciousness are subject to the same rules as Gravity and Light, a person is subject to as much mythology and superstition as is any devout acolyte.

A strong statement by the scientific community that the fundamental paradigms of physics are theory and incomprehensive is not enough; the term "theory" when so applied has evolved, in the public's mind, to connote almost an accepted certainty.  The fact that the currently accepted foundation of academic physics is based upon metaphysics, and that it scrupulously avoids the issues of life and consciousness, is seldom, even privately, acknowledged, or so considered, by physicists; who, for the most part, otherwise, abhor that which can not be proven.  Physicists do adequately address the
"how" of Nature; but, they fall far short concerning an understanding of the "why's" of Nature.  It is because of the misunderstanding of the "why's" of Nature and the physicists' silence concerning life and consciousness that accounts for much of the self-imposed suffering of the human race.

Physicists tend to present their theories (the Atomic
theory, Special and General Relativity theories, Quantum theory, the Big Bang theory, Black Hole theory, Inflation theory, Quantum Chromodynamics theory, et cetera) as fact.  Or, possibly, even more recklessly, most scientists stand aside without argument and allow others in the general media to present the fundamental and ancillary theories of physics as fact; often, without any known mention that they are only unproven theories that are internally inconsistent and fraught with irreconcilable difficulties and omissions.

Currently, no two fundamental theories of physics are completely reconcilable with one another.  As with religions that, impossibly, claim that each is infallible, most likely . . . none are correct.

The obfuscation of the
"why's" of Reality's perceptions by physicists has encouraged, for all persons, including physicists themselves, much misunderstanding and subsequent, direct and consequential, suffering.  Myth and superstition, to any degree, are deleterious.

The inability of most elite physicists to communicate fundamental theory beyond their mathematically-oriented, arcane discipline, as reflected by their current paradigms, as anything other than an impression of their certainty concerning their general understanding of Reality is egregious and arrogant.  And, also, this lack of critical communication is quite, directly, responsible for much of said human suffering . . . pain, both mental and physical.

False prophets, that underlie most that is evil, proliferate when aggressive exposure of myth and superstition is silent.

There must be an emphasis upon removing all excessive metaphysics from the paradigms of physics; a strong beginning would be to clearly establish that which is currently metaphysical and illusionary: such as, the currently accepted concepts concerning linear space-time and the fundamental forces.  This would create an environment more conducive to alternative reasoning; and, it would assist with the acceptance of life and consciousness theories into the collegial domain of academic physics.


Proselytizing for their narrow, transcendental cause is more deceptive as practiced by physicists than is even that of the theologians and philosophers.  Theologians, as represented by the practicing clergy, may be more actively involved and disingenuous; but, others are able to judge more easily their deception than that of the theoretical physicists.

Recently, philosophers have had little influence upon the thoughts and behavior of the general public because they cannot even agree among themselves as to the meanings and interrelationships of their many contentious disciplines; and, also, for the most part, philosophers have recently abdicated the study of physical Reality to the scientists, and metaphysics to the theologians; consequently, there is very little of substance that remains for the discipline of philosophy.  Science, theology, and philosophy are diverging, increasingly, from their early historical unity.

Theologians are generally quite honest concerning their lack of "scientific proof"; and, they are quite up front about their religious arguments requiring both: a large amount of faith; and, an acceptance that religious proofs cannot be directly known.

Almost the
exact opposite of the theologians' stance are the arguments of physicists and, to a lesser extent, the arguments of philosophers; yet, the analogy, that fundamental physics' practitioners and their paradigms are analogous to that of religions' high priests and Scripture . . . is quite apt; because both are near the apex of elitism; and, neither have any rigorous proofs as to their most fundamental concepts and beliefs.

There is absolutely no agreement between world-class physicists as to the nature of any fundamental truth that underlies any of their primary concepts of space, time, and force; concepts that are, for the most part, only illusions predicated upon the human condition.  In fact, there is little speculation, at all, among world-class physicists concerning the natural origins of said fundamental concepts.

Not only are all the current, fundamental paradigms of physics quite in error; but, also, in error is the uniform system of numbers which underlies most of the mathematics upon which the foundation and proofs of physics are established.  The Hindu-Arabic numbering system is both uniform and linear; the only other such concept in nature that is uniform and linear is Newton's description of inertia . . . both are without proof . . . both are seriously flawed.

In
Nature, there are no perfectly straight lines; nor, perfectly circular circles.  Such straight lines and circles are only generated at the limits of the distance between an ellipse's foci; and precise limits are only at Infinity, which is beyond Reality.  Nature's  fundamental curves are sinusoidal ellipses, which generate prime numbers and helical ellipses.

Prime numbers are
Nature's numbering units, which together with "Fibonacci" sequencing accounts for Nature's exponential-like powers of scale from the subatomic to the cosmic.  Sinusoidal and elliptical curves are, respectively, the geometric curves of Light and Gravity; thus, prime numbers unite the formulas of  Light and Gravity . . . the quest of Einstein.

Nature's numbering system is based upon four classes of prime numbers; rather than, equal units of odd and even integers.  Nature's numbering system is referred to as Conceptual Arithmetic, which is a subset of Unimetry.

All the current, fundamental paradigms of physics contain internal inconsistencies; and, none are reconcilable with one another.

To reconcile and remove the inconsistencies of current, fundamental theory, and to address the issues of  speed and time related to
Infinity, as well as, life and consciousness, an entirely new perception of
Reality is required; this new perception, or "new physics," is best illustrated by Conceptual Relativity, which is considered a Paradigm Shift !

And, this Paradigm Shift !  is applied to more than scientific theory; and, as thus, it is referred to as:  Conceptualism . . . an all encompassing philosophy concerning an understanding of Reality . . . and Infinity.

Conceptualism is a discipline that emphasizes scientific method, enlightenment, and Intelligent Inquiry; and, more specifically, it concerns Oneness and the Unified Concept;
its purpose is to liberate the impressed minds of persons exposed to myth and superstition in the sciences; and, thereby, establish an Intelligent Inquiry which will be conducive to minimizing an over reliance upon blind faith; and, thereby, not only unify the fundamental theories of physics; but, also, unify the disciplines of Science, Theology, and Philosophy.

March 24, 1999    



An important scientific innovation rarely makes its way by gradually winning over and converting its opponents: it rarely happens that Saul becomes Paul.  What does happen is that its opponents gradually die out and that the growing generation is familiarized with the idea from the beginning.

.                           -Max Planck [1858-1947]     
 The Philosophy of Physics, 1936
   

 

 













There is one Universe.

It is perpetual, in equilibrium; and,

a manifestation of the . . . Unified Concept;


also,

are a single discipline, which proclaims the

perpetuity and nexus of Life; such is


. . . Conceptualism.





Terms of: 
Copyright 1999-2007 by Brunardot














000101 0:01 am