The lack of a general understanding
that the fundamental principals of physics are entirely dependent upon faith
. . . that is: Metaphysics
(that which requires much faith to understand the logic of its
postulates) . . . is largely because:
|
The certainty of applied
scientific method, concerning said fundamental principles, is strongly
implied by academia . . . rather than academia clearly stating that: The
fundamental principles of physics
result
from theory that is derived from mysterious phenomena that is not
currently understood by any member of post-modern academia |
|
Usually,
these fundamental principles involve orthogonal space;
cyclic and linear time; and four forces, sometimes
fewer
forces, sometimes more, depending upon which
authority is being consulted .
. . also, the Inverse Square Law should be included; and, unbelievably,
often forgotten, the entire discipline of mathematics is a fundamental
principle of physics..
The
fundamental
forces that are most usually
considered are: gravity, light, the strong
atomic
force,
and
the
weak atomic force;
occasionally,
several
of these forces are considered as one by some physicists; and, others
sometimes include
inertia;
or,
as
it's often known:
the cosmological
constant,
or more recently, either Cosmic inertia; or even, enigmatic "dark" energy that emanates from
the void.
Thus, generally, the considered forces are between three and five; however,
the general consensus is that there are four fundamental forces.
The cosmological constant is often considered
as
a force because of
its inertia-like opposition to gravity.
Because of recent observations of galactic recession and other
cosmic motions, the cosmological constant has been resurrected from a
long discarded conceptual contrivance of Einstein's.
However, for post-modern observation and application, Einstein was wrong about the cosmological constant being
constant; and, he, also, misplaced the source and direction of its action.
Astronomers often refer to a form of this force as the mysterious,
observed "Great Attractor."
The
fundamental etiology and nature of all these concepts of
orthogonal space, time, The Inverse Square Law, mathematics, and forces are little
understood . . . if
at all. Thus, an understanding of the "Why?" of these concepts, as professed by
academia, requires much faith . . . a prerequisite for
metaphysics.
The fundamental concepts of
physics have been invented/contrived to explain observed, natural happenings.
And, thus, their proof is often mistaken because the natural happenings,
happen to happen. This proof is circular, at best; these fundamental concepts
are not
presently
provable
with any currently acceptable theory. In fact all fundamental
physics is "theory" because none of it is provable . . .
a prerequisite for metaphysics.
The
current theories
are
little
more than
a form of symbolism that is useful for representing
inexplicable, natural phenomena; and are thus, similar to the gods which
were invented
during
early history
to explain the
stars,
sun, thunder, lightning,
life,
consciousness, death,
and so on.
Quite likely, the ancients had a better
natural
understanding of god than
the designing, anthropomorphic representations that modern religions now
provide.
An
ancient person of learning was a combination scientist, theologian, and
philosopher; a combination seldom seen in the modern
"scientific" era; these disciplines, Science, Theology, and
Philosophy, have
gone their separate ways in search of the same goal: understanding and explaining our
natural environment so that we can, by design, better live our lives.
Space and time have been linked
by Einstein's
concept
that has been labeled:
space-time. Though
there is much justification for such a linkage, it is still similar to linking
the words "light-gravity" and their enigmatic connotations.
The linkage of space and time, each a poorly understood concept, in
itself, only creates confusion. Particularly,
when space is no more than a relative illusion of our senses.
And, time, two distinct concepts, is, both, confusingly, and often, circularly defined.
Space, more appropriately time,
is not only a function of speed, but it does not actually exist as usually
envisaged . . . it is relative;
and
an illusion.
There is no
such
a thing as
"space" where
"something" such as light
waves can not be found. In fact,
all matter, no matter how dense, is composed entirely of wave phenomena.
It is our senses that are not sensitive enough to perceive certain
"dark-matter,"
"particles,"
rays,
and waves, which completely fill all
"space." Our
senses, thus, create the illusion of matter
from the motion of energy and resonance such that the energy (light) is
contained;
and, subsequently, the illusion of
voids,
or "space," between
matter,
which consists of
various wave phenomena.
Reality is without voids.
Reality is causal and local; everything is in resonant contact with something . . .
and everything . . .
without
concern for "time". . .
at some relative speed.
The apparitions of Reality's
non-local phenomena; such as
tunneling,
quantum teleportation, photon entanglement, universal gravitational and inertial
action-at-a-distance, et cetera; are associated with triquametric motion and speeds beyond that of
light.
Time, fundamentally, is a mystery
to physicists. The label "time" refers to several phenomena which are usually, deceptively commingled.
There is cyclical time, linear time, electromagnetic time, et cetera; as
well as, directional and reversible time that must be considered.
No one has been able to clearly define
whether
time is directional; nor,
differentiate, clearly, the differing concepts of time; nor, explain the
generative origins of these "times."
Time as a function of, or a form of, speed is the most fundamental, and
thus mysterious, of concepts which underlie
Reality.
Time, currently, certainly qualifies as being metaphysical.
No one can explain the
"Why?" of gravity; only the "How?" is explainable. No one
knows the speed of gravity, which
must
be near infinite otherwise the Cosmos would forsake
"clockwork" for the action of billiard balls.
However, infinite speed is not allowed by most interpretations of the
theory of Special Relativity. But,
then, if gravity's speed were as allowed by the usual interpretation of the
theory of Special Relativity, gravitons and gravity "waves" should have been found
by now. They have not been found;
nor, has any other physical manifestation of the cause (Why?) of gravity's action-at-a-distance been
observed or rationalized.
Gravity's attraction, or
"action-at-a-distance," is an inexplicable mystery that has defied any
interpretation.
(Newton)...hinted
that Gravity was direct, divine action, as were all forces....
Thus, (for Newton) gravity was spiritual. --Anna Marie Roos, Ph.D.
History.
Einstein considered
action-at-a-distance as . . . "spooky."
Richard Feynman, also a renowned physicist, stated: "Gravitation
is...not understandable in terms of other phenomena."
And, also: "The
possibility exists...that gravity itself is a pseudo force. Is it not
possible that perhaps gravitation is due simply to the fact that we do
not have the right coordinate system?”
Gravity, as currently understood,
can easily be said to belong to the realm of metaphysics.
Actually, it will be found that
the phenomenon of gravitational "attraction" is a
form of both relative, hierarchic compression and confluent congruence.
Confluent congruence is a universal phenomenon that effects all events
and occurs near Infinity well
beyond the speed of light;
but, not quite within the realm of metaphysics.
Light is understood even less
than gravity, if that is possible. Sometimes,
the phenomenon of light is explained as acting like a wave; and, at other times,
light appears to act as a particle. The
concepts of particle and wave are two concepts that cannot be more physically,
or diametrically, opposed to one another; nor, when combined, as with the theory
of light, more inexplicable without resorting to metaphysics.
Also, of metaphysical interest, concerning light, is the current
explanation of the speed of light as being relatively constant.
This constant is unlike anything else known and defies all known logic.
Again, a strong metaphysical faith is
a
requirement for understanding
both light and its
speed as a constant.
The atomic strong and weak forces
have been fabricated, admittedly, by physicists to explain observed subatomic
phenomena. No one has ever been
able to explain
"why" these
subatomic forces "work."
Or, for that matter, there are no answers to the related questions of:
How did such a tremendous amount of energy, as is observed, get into an
atom?; and, What is holding this energy within the atom?
There is much metaphysical faith required concerning an understanding of atomic
theory, and particularly, the
atomic strong and weak forces.
And then, concerning inertia:
there are very few physicists that will even acknowledge that there is an
inertial force . . . despite many recent cosmic observations to the
contrary.
Newton incorrectly defined inertia as being straight and uniform.
Inertia appears to act from the infinite, as opposed to gravity which
appears to act from
the infinitesimal. Thus, the source of inertia, being so far from
the anthropic scale, appears to be without curvature or acceleration.
Inertia's
small force is quite apparent when applied to large cosmic bodies.
Inertia's close relative,
the cosmological constant, can hardly qualify as a force until it is
acknowledged that it is not a constant. By
definition, a mechanical force cannot be constant; it must entail acceleration.
Einstein resorted to the cosmological constant because of structural
necessity; but, he soon realized it as a mistake; as he had interpreted it.
Though, Einstein can hardly be faulted; as an understanding of the source
and etiology of both gravity and inertia is still quite erroneous . . .
if interpreted at all.
A form of a cosmological force
that opposes gravity, and is, thus, structurally necessary, must be explainable
if our environment is to be understood . . . and, most importantly, an
inertial force,
if
it exists, and it does,
can replace the considered necessity of the misleading Big Bang
theory, and all of its
absurdities,
as the structural force, which opposes gravity. Such
an inertial force is referred to as Cosmic Inertia, which together with gravity,
its alter ego, is referred to
as, within
Conceptualism, Infinite Dynamics.
Gravity, inertia, and the atomic
forces are all very closely related to the enigmatic and ubiquitous phenomenon
which has been described as exotic "dark" matter.
It is this unknown, and unfound, "dark" matter that is generally considered
to constitute almost all of the mass
of the Universe.
Thus, the linkage of
Pulsoids, which manifest as
"exotic"
dark matter,
and evolve to the other fundamental phenomena of academic physics.
Pulsoids liberate the theories of physics from the metaphysical beyond
that of the minimal faith of the existence of motion as required by the Unified Concept.
|